Which of the following would best describe secondary evidence? A. Oral testimony by a non-expert witness B. Oral testimony by an expert witness C. A copy of a piece of evidence D. Evidence that proves a specific act
Correct Answer: C
Explanation:
Secondary evidence is defined as a copy of evidence or oral description of its contents. It is considered not as reliable as best evidence. Evidence that proves or disproves a specific act through oral testimony based on information gathered through he witness’s five senses is considered direct evidence. The fact that testimony is given by an expert only affects the witness’s ability to offer an opinion instead of only testifying of the facts.
Source: KRUTZ, Ronald L. & VINES, Russel D., The CISSP Prep Guide: Mastering the Ten Domains of Computer Security, John Wiley & Sons, 2001, Chapter 9: Law, Investigation, and Ethics (page 310).
Please disable your adblocker or whitelist this site!